![]() Nexus standard in developing the rule, as well as theĮxpanding that limit have challenged regulators, developers, The Corps and EPA used Justice Kennedy’s significantĬWA jurisdiction and the consequences of restricting or Legal and policy questions regarding the geographic limit of Including isolated waters and streams that flow only part ofįilling of spoil material through mining or excavation). Jurisdictional status following the Supreme Court’s rulings,įrom factories or sewage treatment plants and dredging and Including wetlands, require a CWA permit (e.g., pollutants Discharges to waters,Ĭlarifying the regulatory status of waters with ambiguous The 2015 final rule retained much of the structure of theĭefining the scope of waters protected and regulated underĪgencies’ prior definition of WOTUS. (80 Federal Register 37053), which revised regulations In June 2015, the Army Corps of Engineers andįormal rulemaking to revise the existing rules.Įnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) published the Clean Water-or “Waters of the United States”-final rule What Is in the Clean Water Rule? Interpretive questions, and diverse stakeholders requested a Updated OctoOverview of the Army Corps and EPA Rule to Define “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) and Recent Developments Overview: What Is “WOTUS”?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |